Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Economy. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Economy. Mostrar todas las entradas

2016/08/18

How Argentina Can Rebuild Its Economy


When Mauricio Macri was inaugurated president of Argentina last December, he announced that his biggest goal was to regenerate the economy of his country. Where should he lead his efforts? Experts believe that it is crucial to restore the confidence of foreign investors in Argentina in order to attract the capital that the country needs to improve its infrastructure, production volumes and competitiveness. However, that will be only the beginning of a long road that is bound to be full of challenges and headaches for Argentina.
Macri’s election ended twelve years of populist “Kirchnerism” in the country — an era that began in 2003 with the first administration of President Nestor Kirchner, and continued during the two terms of his wife, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Macri entered the Casa Rosada [“Pink House”] – Argentina’s equivalent of the White House – with promises of transforming his country into an economic model for Latin America. Macri said he aims to turn Argentina into a prosperous nation that attracts the attention of international investors who are eager to do business in that resource-rich nation.
The first and foremost step in that direction was taken on April 21, 2016, when the new chief executive delivered the $9.3 billion that Argentina owed to the so-called “vulture funds” — the 7% of Argentina’s creditors who had rejected the negotiated restructuring of the country’s debt in 2004 and 2010, and then decided to claim their funds in New York courts. In deciding to deliver those funds, Macri put an end to fourteen years of default and returned Argentina to international debt markets.
The Macri government’s next goal is to return to complete competitiveness in a globalized world. After six months in power, and an analysis of the situation, Macri’s economic team estimates that in order to reach that goal, Argentina needs investments worth some one hundred billion American dollars.
Mauro Guillen, director of Wharton’s Lauder Institute, explains that Macri has been “trying to unblock the situation internationally by reaching agreement with the various bondholders while at the same time trying to keep the opposition in Argentina under control. The various unions in Argentina are deeply divided.” Recently, however, “the three major union groups have come together [because] they want to oppose what the [Macri] government is doing.”
The international situation is particularly troubling, given that until three or four years ago, “Argentina was benefitting big time from China’s growth in terms of exports of soy and soy beans and so on,” Guillen notes. “It is a difficult situation, but Macri has the support of the business community and of the international community. When he came to power, I predicted that the [opposition party known as the] Peronists were going to make his life nearly impossible. So let’s see if he can survive his first year in office without any major problems.” According to the Buenos Aires Herald, no democratic non-Peronist leader has managed to complete his term as Argentine president since Marcelo T. de Alvear did so in 1928.
“Macri is very committed to making a difference in Argentina, and I don’t think he is going to shy away from the challenges.” –Mauro Guillen
When it comes to the new investments that Macri hopes to attract, “Beyond the [dollar] amount of the investments, the most important thing is how those funds will be applied,” notes Enrique Lucio Kawamura, professor at the University of San Andrés in Buenos Aires. The dollar value of such investments is debatable, since the exact figure usually depends on many assumptions that can almost never be perfectly known in advance, says Kawamura, who has been studying both the productive sectors where those investments will be realized as well as the kinds of investments involved. “It is not the same thing to invest a certain amount to acquire new ‘know-how’ about production processes that discretely increase productivity as it is to invest that same amount simply in replacing depreciated machinery, for example.”
Guillen notes that Macri is not only a successful business person but also someone who has been in the public eye in Argentina for a very long time. Son of a prominent Italian businessman in the industrial and construction sectors, Macri gained national recognition in 1995 when he became president of Boca Juniors, one of the two most popular football clubs in the country. In 2005, he created the center-right electoral front Republican Proposal, known as PRO. Explains Guillen, “I think he is very committed to making a difference in Argentina, and I don’t think he is going to shy away from the challenges or give up. He understands the stakes and he knows that no matter how tough the situation gets, he needs to persevere, to be very forceful. He has a lot of enemies; everybody does in Argentina. I think he is keenly aware of that; he understands the Argentine political system, not just as a business person but as a politician.”
Strong Support from the U.S. and Europe
“Macri has the support of the business community and of the international community,” notes Guillen. “Both Europe and the United States are very supportive. Europe and the United States have long been suspicious of the Peronists and the Kirchnerists. Everybody outside of Argentina – in Europe and the United States as well as in Mexico and Chile – was hoping that Macri would win, so he has a lot of political capital” in those countries. “At the same time, he is seen as an enemy by Bolivia and Venezuela and Ecuador,” whose populist governments are opposed to Macri’s free-market reforms. In any case, “Europe and the U.S. matter much more now, especially in terms of reaching financial deals and insuring that there will be more foreign investment in Argentina. That is one of the key advantages that he has.”
In July, the German-Argentinian Chamber of Commerce announced that “German companies in Argentina welcome the change in economic policy by Macri’s government,” which should improve the competitiveness of Argentine industry and lead to “a sustainable economic recovery.” The Chamber said that German companies plan to invest about $3 billion in Argentina over the next four years as they welcome changes in economic policy. That month, Macri and German Chancellor Angela Merkel met in Berlin, marking Macri’s first visit as president to Europe’s biggest economy. At a joint news conference, Merkel said, “Nothing stands in the way of closer German-Argentinian cooperation.”
“Beyond the amount of the investments, the most important thing is how those funds will be applied.”–Enrique Lucio Kawamura
Rather than focus on specific numerical targets for foreign investment in Argentina, Martin Simonetta, professor of political economics at the University of Business and Social Sciences (UCES) in Buenos Aires, and director general of the Atlas Foundation for a Free Society, stresses the critical role of building confidence in the country. “It is an enormous challenge to reform decades of economic, political and institutional disorder as well as the resulting disinvestment that the Argentine economy has experienced,” says Simonetta. For this reason, it is fundamental “to recover the lost confidence in the country.” It is also necessary to reform Argentina on a foundation of predictability and transparency that makes it possible to forecast the medium and long term beyond changes of government. “If we manage to rebuild that brand of trust and credibility, investment will recover as a natural result. Regrettably, however, once confidence is lost, it is not re-built from one day to the next,” Simonetta adds.
In a key initiative aimed at rebuilding international confidence, Macri’s team recently created the Argentine Agency for Investors and International Trade, which is responsible for spreading word about the changes occurring in Argentina and building an attractive image for the country. In a major promotional effort, the agency will mount the Forum in Buenos Aires from September 12 to 15. The event will bring together more than 1,500 global investors, government leaders from around the world, and CEOs of Fortune 500 companies from a wide range of sectors, including energy, finance, information technology, infrastructure, agriculture and health care. Speakers will include senior executives from BP, Boeing, Siemens, Coca-Cola, Unilever, Dow Chemical and Lazard.
According to Simonetta, Macri’s investment priorities should be to modernize Argentina’s road and railroad infrastructure, and to increase funding for agriculture, mining and renewable energy. One of the most ambitious infrastructures is called the Belgrano Plan. Its goal is to promote the northern region of the country by investing 2 billion dollars in its infrastructure. The Plan also incorporates initiatives for creating some 250,000 housing units, and providing tax and labor incentives for those companies that set up operations in that region.
According to Kawamura, the government’s private investment priorities should be to increase the productivity of those “dynamic” sectors that have high potential for exporting, such as software and highly differentiated manufactured goods, as well as agribusiness industries that meet the demands of markets in Asia in ways guaranteed to generate a “sustainable” flow of foreign exchange. In that regard, he believes that it is “important to have a strategic plan for thinking about specific policies that introduce appropriate incentives for private investments that have such a goal.” When it comes to public sector investments, he says it is necessary “to undertake policies for investments in transportation infrastructure that guarantee the reduction of costs in the most efficient ways possible. The goal of such a strategy is to make important decisions that generate pressure on unions and other stakeholders … who threaten to act against that efficiency.”
Beyond economic considerations, Kawamura argues the importance of building a reliable structure for making public sector decisions. He believes that there has to be a much more profound discussion about whether the system – as it works today – does not threaten these economic goals, “since its functioning sometimes produces a short-term bias, which does not help to implement even the minimal amount of credibility that guarantees reasonable returns for those sectors exposed to significant amounts of investments over the long term.”
“The Pacific is the fastest-growing region on the planet, and Argentina must jump onto that train.”–Martin Simonetta
Along the same lines, Simonetta argues, “The priorities are institutional. That is to say, to invest in building a political framework that enables people to make decisions and plan with goals for the medium and long term as a result.” At the same time, he notes that “the country’s potential is unlimited.” He believes that there is an enormous opportunity in the agribusiness sector, “which possesses a prodigious amount of resources in an unprecedented context of growth in world population, and a resulting growth in demand for food.”
New Directions in Trade Policy
Another key to Macri’s strategy is to integrate Argentina into the South American market. In so doing, Macri is distancing himself, however, from the policy directives laid out by the previous government, which committed itself to the regional development model developed by Mercosur (founded in 1991), a trade bloc that comprises Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela. In so doing, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner was distancing Argentina from the Pacific Alliance. Launched in 2012, the Pacific Alliance trade bloc — comprised of Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru — provides some 40% of Latin America’s total Gross Domestic Product, almost 60% more than Mercosur, according to the World Trade Organization. However, ex-President Fernandez de Kirchner was afraid that the Alliance’s goal of promoting free trade in capital and services could damage some less competitive sectors of the Argentine economy. Macri’s turnabout has been total in the sense that Argentina has already become an “official observer” in the Pacific Alliance, the first step toward its eventual full membership in the grouping.
Simonetta believes that it is “fundamental” for Argentina to integrate itself into the global economy, but that Mercosur is not the best way to position Argentina in Latin America. “Mercosur was a useful tool in its time, but the integration process has been stopped. Nowadays, the Pacific is the fastest-growing region on the planet, and Argentina must jump onto that train. We must be part of the dynamic processes of integration that speed up the growth of the economies [of the Pacific region], and we must leave behind the protectionist fortresses” of the past.
However, Kawamura warns, “Free trade, in itself, does not guarantee any greater competitiveness” for Argentina. The country must establish greater participation in international markets, “but through an integral plan of incentives for investments that generate the increased productivity that assures us that the greater participation [of Argentina in such markets] also spurs a substantial increase in the exports of those products that are not necessarily primary products in the agribusiness sector,” where Argentina has traditionally been competitive. He adds that it is important “to analyze our country’s capability to negotiate a potential entry into the Pacific Alliance with respect to other member countries.” Argentina should analyze its “comparative advantages, in order to prevent its entry into this sort of trade group from leading to balance of payments problems that [wind up being] hard to resolve.”
Optimism Despite the Challenges
Are Macri’s chances for charting such a course for Argentina already beginning to fade? His approval ratings dropped from 51% in March 2016 to 44% at the end of May, according to Management and Fit, a polling company in the Argentine capital. In August, however, Macri’s Finance Minister Alfonso Prat Gay announced that the economy was already showing positive signs, and that it would grow again this year. Prat Gay added that Argentina’s economic reintegration to the world is already helping the country attract the foreign capital that it needs to control inflation and encourage economic activity. “The hardest time has passed,” Prat Gay assured reporters, referring to the government-sponsored utility hikes and the peso devaluation. “We are much better than many believed. We have made progress in the first six months. There was a recovery in May that was confirmed in June.”
For his part, Guillen has not abandoned hope. “I am optimistic. [But] let’s not minimize the difficulties that [Macri] is facing with the domestic political situation. He has sworn enemies, and they are going to do whatever they can to make him fail.”

Is China’s Latest Economic Data a Sign of Deeper Disconnects?


As China last Friday reported a slowing economy in July 2016, fresh questions are being raised about the country’s policy directions and pace of growth. Uncertainty rules the air amid disconnects between policy pronouncements on a shift from state-led investments to a market-based economy on the one side, and a continuation of state dominance on the other.
The absence of worthy investment projects is driving a disproportionate amount of bank lending to real estate, which has also brought along the specter of bad loans. Jobs are scarce, and an aging population means more people are chasing the jobs that are available. Bright spots do exist, though, such as a promising high-technology sector and rising consumption spending, signaling some of the shift policy-makers desire.
The slowdown in private investment seen in the July numbers is among the worst indicators for the Chinese economy. A Wall Street Journal report of last Friday said a spokesman for China’s National Bureau of Statistics had acknowledged at a briefing that “many private businesses were reluctant to expand against a backdrop of cooling growth.” Industrial production rose 6.0% in July from a year earlier, slower than the 6.2% growth of June, the report added.
“Two years ago, we had a conversation on this and the key word was ‘uncertainty;’ two years down the road, that is still the case,” said Wharton management professor Minyuan Zhao. She was referring to a Knowledge@Wharton article from December 2014 in which Erin Ennis, senior vice president of the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC) had said that U.S. firms “are particularly concerned with a lot of uncertainties in China.”
Private investment has fallen because China’s president Xi Jinping has said he wants to ensure that state-owned enterprises are “better, stronger [and] larger,” she explained. “If you are a smart [private] enterprise owner, what do you do?” she asked, suggesting that such policies would deter private investment.
“China is still a top-down economy.”–Minyuan Zhao
Zhao said that in her visits to China, she finds people struggling to correctly interpret government signals on where the economy is headed. That is because of disconnects between the government’s strong language on a shift away from the state sector to the private sector and ground realities, she explained. “China is still a top-down economy,” she said.
A Slow Switch to a New Normal
The big question is whether the “new normal” for China’s GDP growth of between 6% and 7% is sustainable, said Jacques deLisle, law and political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and director of Penn’s Center for East Asian Studies. Much hinges on how China’s new growth model is implemented, he said. The new model assumes slower growth, but not all the pieces are in place to make that policy successful, he added.
Zhao and deLisle spoke on the outlook for the Chinese economy on the Knowledge@Wharton show on Wharton Business Radio on SiriusXM channel 111. (Listen to the podcast at the top of this page.)
China is showing mixed results in its efforts to rebalance its economy from investments toward consumption and services, said deLisle. Rebalancing the economy from exports to the domestic economy is occurring to a degree, he noted. With the state sector still dominating the policy agenda, the de-emphasis on state-driven investments is not occurring fast enough, he added. The commitment to reform state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to put them fully on a market basis is “dead in the water … and is almost going in reverse,” he continued. Cleaning up China’s financial system to make it “more disciplined and more market-oriented” is another commitment on which he saw little traction.
Housing Boom: A Twin-Sided Blade
The picture is mixed with respect to increasing bad loans at Chinese banks, which Zhao rated as the other big depressing factor for the economy. “The housing boom is both the consequence and the cause for the slowdown,” she said. It is a consequence of the slowdown because the paucity of investment-worthy projects in the real economy compels banks to lend to the housing sector, she explained.
“That is one of the sources of malaise in the cities – people who are graduating and not finding jobs.”–Jacques deLisle
Such disproportionate lending to housing has brought a spike in nonperforming housing loans as well. But two factors have helped banks regain lost ground as a result of those bad loans. One, Chinese banks are hiving off non-performing loans to asset management firms and writing them off “in a big way,” said Zhao. Two, they have benefitted from an unexpected housing market boom in a slow economy. Shanghai and Shenzhen have seen real estate prices soar 50% or so in the last year. “In a sense, the individual households are bailing out the big banks,” she said. As a consequence, the balance sheets of the large state-owned banks “don’t look as bad as alarmists would like you to believe.”
The housing sector has traditionally been a favorite investment destination in China, according to deLisle. He said household savings have typically had few investment options. Bank deposits yield very low or negative interest rates, the stock market is similar to a casino and parking savings overseas is not an option for all, he said. “And so it flows into [areas] like the housing sector,” he added. Zhao said policy makers have placed high priority on taming housing prices because they tend to deter the desired increases in household consumption.
That housing boom has an inflationary effect on businesses elsewhere in the economy, making it difficult for them to survive, said Zhao. She said that many managers in Shanghai she recently interviewed planned to move out to other parts of the country because the young people they want to hire, especially those in the R&D sector, are unable to afford housing in the city.
According to deLisle, the employment outlook is uninspiring, and he explained why that was so. Demographic pressures include an aging population, and so people stay employed into their later years. He noticed a vast expansion in higher education — even if it is of uneven quality — producing college graduates looking for jobs. “That is one of the sources of malaise in the cities – people who are graduating and not finding jobs,” he said.
Job opportunities have shrunk also because China is no longer as inexpensive as it used to be, and manufacturing of cheap products has moved to places like Vietnam and Bangladesh. Consequently, businesses in China are trying to find opportunities in value-added manufacturing, but those are harder to come by and more difficult to manage, said deLisle.
“It’s not a disaster story. It’s a decline from a super-heated, happy-days-are-here-again-forever [scenario], and it is a concern about how to keep it rolling going forward.”–Jacques deLisle
Pockets of Optimism
On the other hand, Zhao sees “pockets of optimism,” especially in the technology sector. “If you are riding the high-speed rail while browsing the web, ordering dinner for you, waiting for you at home when you arrive, [you would say], ‘This is a wonderful China — the Wall Street Journal is painting such a negative picture because it is so good, so convenient and so ahead of the U.S.’ But after dinner when you talk with your friends, they would talk of the uncertainty on where to go next. So it’s a very mixed picture.”
While manufacturing jobs are scarce, “the transition [to the new service economy] is happening,” said Zhao, citing bright spots in the July data on spending on travel and entertainment. Both she and deLisle said a big positive sign is consumption spending growing at 10% annually. “That is rebalancing towards consumption,” said deLisle. “It’s not a disaster story. It’s a decline from a super-heated, happy-days-are-here-again-forever [scenario], and it is a concern about how to keep it rolling going forward.”

2015/11/23

China about to become less dependent on the dollar

TAKESHI KAWANAMI, Nikkei staff writer
A U.S. $100 banknote is placed on top of 100 yuan banknotes. © Reuters
WASHINGTON -- The International Monetary Fund's proposed inclusion of China's yuan in its foreign exchange basket would put the Chinese currency on a par with other international currencies.
     Beijing has been working hard to internationalize its currency in a bid to reduce the country's dependence on the U.S. dollar. The yuan's inclusion in the basket would alter the race for monetary hegemony among the world's major economies.
     In a report released on Friday, the IMF said the yuan has met the criteria for joining the Special Drawing Rights basket, which consists of the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, British pound and euro. The IMF proposed the inclusion of the Chinese currency to about 190 member countries. It is set to finalize its decision at an executive board meeting on Nov. 30.
     A number of countries, including the U.S., are likely to approve the recommendation.
     Special Drawing Rights is the term used to describe the IMF's reserve currency assets, which the organization distributes to member countries to head off currency crises. If a member nation finds itself in such a crisis, it can sell part of its rights to other IMF members in exchange for those reserve currencies.
     If the yuan is indeed added to the basket, member nations would likely increase their yuan reserves. Analysts estimate that 10% of foreign currency reserves, or an equivalent of about $1 trillion, would be held in the Chinese currency.
     One reason China is rushing to internationalize the yuan is so it can wean itself off the dollar, an IMF official said. China currently holds approximately $3.5 trillion in foreign currency reserves, mostly U.S. dollars.
     The country faced huge losses as the value of the dollar plummeted in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. This prompted China to hedge against any further negative impact from the U.S. economy and to increase its efforts to internationalize the yuan.
     There is also a matter of saving face. China will play host to leaders of the Group of 20 advanced and emerging nations next year, and President Xi Jinping and his administration want the yuan to be a Special Drawing Rights currency before then.
     China has intended to turn the yuan -- now effectively pegged to the dollar -- into a widely traded and freely usable currency by 2020. To switch to a floating exchange system, Beijing will need to further liberalize capital transactions going forward.
A liberalized financial market would help China attract investments from overseas, but the country would also face higher risks of capital flight in economic downturns.
http://asia.nikkei.com/

2015/10/08

Brazil and South Africa: Could Turmoil Lead to Default?

Rio-de-Janeiro

MIC LISTEN TO THE PODCAST:

Franklin Allen on the risks facing Brazil and South Africa
The economic slowdown in China has taken an economic toll on supplier countries – particularly emerging markets – that provide raw materials and other inputs. Some analysts say it is a key reason why investors are now worried that Brazil and South Africa could default on loans. But Wharton finance professor Franklin Allen says he does not expect either country to default. And while the slowdown in China has certainly led to weaker demand for such commodity exporters, “I think particularly Brazil — but also to some extent South Africa — has many additional problems” – notably, corruption.
In this Knowledge in 5 interview – the second in a three-part series (see part one here) — Allen points out that currency and credit markets will continue to provide the best indicators of the economic health for the two countries. More generally, he also sees a “significant, [although] maybe not a major, probability” of a global financial crisis of some kind as a result the slowing global economy and adjustment problems that may crop up when the U.S. Federal reserve starts raising interest rates – most likely by year end.
Meanwhile, Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, noted this week that emerging market countries (and bond markets) expect rising corporate bankruptcies when the Fed finally starts to move up interests rates. The IMF has counseled the Fed to hold increases off until 2016. At the same time, the Institute of International Finance, a trade group, announced that emerging markets saw the largest divestment of assets since 2008 – some $40 billion worth – during the third quarter.
An edited transcript follows.
Knowledge@Wharton: Brazil might be exhibit “A” for how emerging markets are being affected by China and a general global economic slowdown. Its currency is down more than 30% this year against the dollar. Investors are increasingly betting that Brazil and also South Africa might default on their debts. The South African rand is down about 15%. It used to be thought that emerging markets would be the new economic locomotive, pulling other economies along, perhaps as the U.S. has for decades. What do you think is going on?
“I don’t think it is likely that [Brazil and South Africa] will default, but it is certainly now a possibility … [that] investors are worried about, so they are pulling the money out now.”
Franklin Allen: I think particularly Brazil — but also to some extent South Africa also — has many additional problems on top of those problems that we have been discussing [See: “The China Syndrome — How Volatility Is Affecting ASEAN”].
In Brazil, there is the issue of the corruption. There is the problem that the finance minister, who was expected to get the finances in order and be very tough, does not seem to have full support in the cabinet. The president [Dilma Rousseff] is very weak — her approval ratings are down to 8%, I believe, which is one of the lowest scores seen in any country.
They are supposed to have financial transactions taxed to plug a hole in the deficits, but she did not get that through, so now they are looking at a deficit of 8% to 10% — that kind of number. This is within a country with quite high debt levels, I believe 60% to 70% … in a year’s time if they do not plug the gap. And they are paying 7% real rates of interest on much of this debt. It is quite an unstable situation. I don’t think it is likely that they will default, but it is certainly now a possibility, and I think that is something that investors are worried about, so they are pulling the money out now, and things are not good there.
Hopefully, they will be able to pass some other kind of tax, and plug the deficit, and get the public finances in order, but they are still far away from doing that. And then on top of that they have got all of these global issues. So if you are an investor in Brazil currently — and it looks like the U.S. is going to put its rates up — now it seems as if it is time to get your money out before the exchange rate plummets even more, and get a high return in the U.S.
I think that is a lot of what is happening. In terms of the real economy, the slowdown in China is obviously not a good thing for them. It is an interesting question how much of that is driving the current problems, as opposed to their idiosyncratic factors, just in terms of the corruption scandals and the political scandals, and so on. South Africa has a bit of the same [situation].
We have not talked about India, but India is the bright point. They seem to be still growing at reasonable rates, but they are not that big of an economy. They have a big population, but they are not a huge economy in global terms. It is a big problem that so much of the growth was provided by emerging market countries, and now that is not going to happen nearly as much, at least for the next few years.

Knowledge@Wharton: If things were going to spin further out of control, say in Brazil or in South Africa, talking about these defaults and that sort of thing, what are the warning signs that we should be looking at? And if they did default, what would be the effects?
 
“It is a big problem that so much of the growth was provided by emerging market countries, and now that is not going to happen nearly as much, at least for the next few years.”

Allen: The currencies are probably the best indicator. Also the bond yield, the government bond yields, although those are probably a little bit less reliable because the government — if they have government controlled banks — can get the banks to buy them and so on. But I think [with the] exchange rate, that is what we are seeing: indications that there are problems in these places. If they were to default in Brazil or in South Africa, I think that would be serious problems for those economies. I am not so sure they would be a big problem globally. But you never know; it may be that people are not expecting that with quite the probability that they should. But let’s hope they are, so that if it happens, it will not be too disruptive in the global economy.
Knowledge@Wharton: Would you say that, in general, the global economy seems to be slowing, but most likely is going to be avoiding any big financial crises? How would you rate the potential for a major financial crisis right now?
Allen: I think there is a significant, [although] maybe not a major, probability of that. I think the other big issue is that as the U.S. unwinds its quantitative easing, what these flows are going to be, how big they are going to be, how they are going to adjust. I don’t think we have much of an idea about that yet. We will get a much better idea once we start seeing a few of these rises in the U.S. policy rate, and how quickly they are doing it.

2014/11/13

What the Election ‘Wake-up Call’ Means for the Economy

On Tuesday, the Republican Party’s electoral sweep — which enabled it to gain a majority in the U.S. Senate and win gubernatorial races in seven Southern states — revealed widespread voter dissatisfaction with President Barack Obama’s administration. However, to retain their momentum in the run up to the 2016 presidential elections, Republicans will have to demonstrate that they can deftly address pressing business and economic concerns including the battle over the minimum wage, job growth and corporate taxation, say Wharton professor of business economics and public policy Kent Smetters and Financial Times reporter Megan Murphy.

“This [Republican victory] wasn’t expected by almost any pollsters, even people who leaned right,” noted Murphy, who will head the Financial Times’ Washington, D.C., news bureau beginning next year. According to Smetters, the onus is now on the Republican Party “to do something” to fix the various issues facing the economy. “[Republican House speaker John] Boehner was complaining for years that everything gets stalled in the Senate. Well, that argument now goes away.” Smetters and Murphy talked about the policy challenges ahead for both parties on the Knowledge@Wharton show on Wharton Business Radio on SiriusXM channel 111. (Listen to the podcast at the top of this page.)
The Republicans clinched a majority of 52 seats in the 100-member Senate by retaining their existing 45 seats and gaining seven more. That could climb to 53 seats, if one factors in yet-to-be announced results for Alaska, which is expected to go Republican. (Results in Virginia may face a challenge.) Louisiana will have a runoff election in December. In the 435-member House of Representatives, Republicans have so far added 14 more seats to lift a majority they already had to 244 seats while results are still flowing in. The sweep extended to the state level, with Republican governors now in 31 states, while Democrats hold 17 states (two are undecided).
Unsettled Voters
In the run-up to the latest elections, the major issues were the future of the controversial Obamacare legislation (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), job growth, wage levels and immigration reform. Another big issue was a proposal to extend the Keystone oil pipeline that runs from Canada to refineries in Nebraska, Illinois and Texas. Environmental groups have strongly opposed the pipeline expansion project, saying that it threatens environmentally sensitive parts of Nebraska.
In dissecting the results of the latest elections and how they might influence the 2016 presidential elections, Murphy said it is important to distinguish between “where we see a real change, and where this is just a one-off reaction [by] a very dissatisfied, unsettled voting population.”
Obama’s desire to raise the federal minimum wage from the current $7.25 an hour to $10.10 is one issue that will likely gain more attention. In Tuesday’s elections, voters in five states (Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska, South Dakota and Illinois) backed moves to increase the minimum wage in phases. “That means voters are really looking at their individual pocket books,” said Murphy.
Added Smetters: “What’s particularly impressive about the minimum wage proposals passing in these red states [is that] they passed in really big margins; these weren’t even close. That has to be a huge wake-up call for Republicans — that’s a winnable issue for Democrats in the next elections.”
Smetters noted that he does not think raising the minimum wage is a smart idea. “It places a tax on low-margin companies,” he explained. “Apple and Google are all fine with the minimum wage because they don’t get taxed. From an economics perspective, it is not one of the best ways to target the poor. However, it is something that gets the [voting] numbers, so the Republicans are going to oppose minimum wage increases at the federal level. They have to be super articulate about what the alternative [will be].”“There’s going to be a very different pro-business agenda than we’ve seen before.”–Megan Murphy
Murphy felt the Keystone pipeline project “is as good as done and is going forward,” now that the Republicans will have a bigger say in it. Bigger issues calling for action will be corporate tax reform, infrastructure spending, immigration reform and specific measures, such as repealing the tax on medical devices, she said.
Pro-business Season?
There’s going to be a very different pro-business agenda than we’ve seen before Twitter ,” said Murphy. She visualized situations where the Republicans would bring to the President legislation passed in both chambers of Congress and dare Obama to use his veto. “He’s going to have to either hold his nose and sign or take the political hit,” she added.
Smetters noted that Republicans might have to strike a compromise with Democrats on overhauling the corporate tax system, which has been driving U.S. companies to relocate to cheaper tax regimes in the U.K. and Europe. “Calls to wave the American flag [are] … just not useful ideas,” he said. The real issue is to change the tax code and replace the current worldwide tax with a territorial tax method, where U.S. companies are not taxed on their earnings across the globe, he added.
More broadly, Murphy saw momentum for economic recovery that needs more fuel. “We are certainly seeing the shoots of a recovery coming through in certain areas of the economy,” she said. “We are in a feel-better [stage] in terms of the data … but we are not yet into a feel-good stage of the economy.”