Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta retail. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta retail. Mostrar todas las entradas

2018/02/16

Promising Benefits of Decentralized Technologies for the Retail Industry

Social changes are typically market-driven and technology driven. We have witnessed new technologies overtaking markets, and likewise, markets creating the need for a new technology. With the pace it's creating a change, blockchain development deserves a ‘hats-off’. It is affecting the retail market in unconventional ways for all of us. Many changes to traditional processes have already happened, and much more is yet to happen. Blockchain is shifting world finances and starts affecting other industries where blockchain developers implement the technology to improve products and services before they reach the end users.

Retail is not only part of the change, but it’s one of the most exciting areas of blockchain development. How come the technology that took off with a new currency spread its impact to finer shopping?   

Current Face of the Retail Industry

Even when we don’t like to get all things at cheaper retailers, we love getting them as soon as possible. In the race of sustaining an optimal role as consumers, we demand and press for better products. But what exactly is a ‘better’ product or service? Does it always come with the tags ‘cheaper’, ‘reliable’ and ‘high-quality’? The definition is a complex web of personal, social and economic factors. We tokenize a variety of values using preferences that not always have to do with money and then decide upon the personal value. Retailers target our needs, injecting additional value with loyalty coupons, special discounts, credit bonuses, gift vouchers, exclusive memberships, priority shipments.

Solving Digital Trust Challenges

It’s not all about the price. A loyal and trusted consumer-retailer relationship has special worth that goes beyond a one-off exchange. In a digital market with strong competition, retailers cope with margins to remain profitable and attractive. This challenge is additionally hampered with creating trust in the multiple offerings.

With the possibility to promise and deliver trust in products and transactions, blockchain development solves the challenge with decentralization. The concept of a World Wide Ledger is at the core of a public and permissionless blockchain. Blockchain applications that can help retailers require some sort of permission or a closed circle of trust. By removing the intermediaries and building a network of participants by invitation, permissioned distributed ledgers are changing the face of the retail industry. Potential benefits include cost reduction, faster processing of transactions, and product originality.

Streamlining, Automation and Cost-Reduction

Data in shared immutable ledgers is easier to manage. Processes can be automated and streamlined, removing the need for back-office work. The retail infrastructure is simplified, in turn improving record-keeping and inventory management. Fraud is minimized, auditing and reporting are made easy, and compliance is straightforward.

All these potential blockchain benefits can help retailers shape competitive product prices, getting access to a borderless global consumer market, and without the need to pay fees to banks, payment processors and online marketplaces. To create better security of the retail chain, businesses adopting blockchain development are basing their trust in the strong built-in encryption of the technology.

From Payments to Ownership and Budgeting

Bitcoin payments are an exemplary blockchain application in retail. Although the coin is not widely accepted, you can already buy a pizza, book a flight and open an e-commerce store. The Russian Burger King chain is accepting bitcoins. Tracking payments is easier. Large purchases won’t need additional verification with official authorities since the ledger record can be shared and used as the single source of truth. The proof of ownership is irrefutable. Retail can go paperless, as the digital receipts issued by shops can be used for refunds and for tracking personal shopping and spending habits.    

Shared Logistics Systems from Manufacturers to Retailers

Traceability of the products in the supply chain enables immediate insight into the origin of the product, ensuring that what you are getting is an original. It will be difficult to sell something inauthentic since the buyer, the seller and any third parties have agreed on all previous transactions and records, limiting the possibility of an untrusted partner to impair the network trust. Counterfeited goods and stolen merchandise can’t get through the replicated unified records. E-warranties are made possible with cloud-based blockchain solutions, removing the need for paper warranties.

Blockchain development has a potential to reshape logistics. Shipments can be tracked at every stage. You can check if your product will be delivered to you in real-time from around the world, without the need to send numerous emails or make phone calls. Since all evidence is kept safe and unchangeable in one distributed ledger, it is easier to locate lost products or check actions that affected the product quality. In turn, the possibility for disputes is smaller.

Intelligent IoT Shops

In view of supermarkets, blockchain development can drastically change how we do our daily shopping for supplies. Intelligent supermarket shops, equipped with IoT sensors and connected to a decentralized database can enable detailed product scrutiny. It might be possible to use the smartphone and check everything about the product with simple code scanning. From supermarkets, the technology can easily be transferred to other branches of the retail industry.

The challenges of market volatility and lack of existing ecosystems for creating trusted partner networks are two problems that blockchain developers are trying to solve. As major obstacles for retailers, they affect adoption. Early adopters will get the chance not only to accrue potential benefits from being the first, but also create new retail ecosystems and influence regulatory authorities in how they shape decentralized shopping on the web.

2018/01/27

What Aldi, BJ's And Ethan Allen Aim To Do In 2018 (You Didn't Hear It At The Big Retail Show)


, 

2017/06/07

Can Retailers Escape the Scourge of Free Shipping?

060617_freeship_boxes
If retailers are hurting today, among the wounds — both self-inflicted and imposed from outside — is free shipping. On the demand side, customers are increasingly expecting free delivery and even free returns. The problem for retailers, of course, is that free shipping cuts deeply into profits.
The innovation bubbled up as a way to get customers comfortable with the idea that online shopping could be no more expensive than physical visits — that it leveled the online total purchase tab with the physical-store receipt.
It worked. The customer has moved online, and now retailers find themselves on the horn of a dilemma. The cost of free shipping to retailers is high, but the cost of yielding loyalty and market share to a competitor is even higher. How did retailers get here?
“One of the first online retailers was Zappos,” says Wharton marketing professor Barbara E. Kahn, who is also director of Wharton’s Jay. H. Baker Retailing Center. “People had thought no one would buy shoes online, because you have to try them on, but Zappos started free shipping and free returns, so that let people buy a size bigger and a size smaller, and free shipping and free returns minimized the risk. That set up the expectation of free shipping. For most of the legacy retailers, because of the costs of the delivery and the returns, they frequently make less money online than in physical stores. The costs are very high.”
Now, among the retailers offering free shipping are Dell, Kate Spade, L.L.Bean, Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom. Last holiday season, Target and Best Buy introduced free shipping, and retailers are reporting that the point at which they often lose an online customer is at the very end of the transaction — when shipping costs get added.
So, what now? Given that online shopping is woven into habit for most U.S. shoppers, might retailers be able to cut out free shipping?
“It might be too hard to walk that back now,” says Wharton marketing professor Peter Fader. “But there are so many areas costing retailers even more — promotions they run — that they should be trying to wean themselves off of.”
Instead, retailers will probably have to find other ways of recouping the cost of free shipping. Ironically, the answer may lie in a phenomenon best illustrated by Amazon, which is of course the source of much of the scramble for market share. Amazon refers to its Prime service as a way to get “fast, free shipping and more,” and many customers themselves refer to the service as being free. But of course, they are paying $10.99 a month or $99 per year for their “free shipping.”
People are good at creating “different mental accounts,” explains Fader. “They keep one account for membership and they are paying for membership, and that is coded entirely separately from this transaction. They are part of the club and they forget about the fee. It’s very clever on Amazon’s part, surrounding the customer with benefits that give the impression that the company has your best interest at heart. People like this.”
“Free shipping is certainly one aspect of how Amazon has recalibrated our consumer brains, to be honest,” says retail futurist Doug Stephens, author of The Retail Revival. Stephens says that Amazon innovations like quick and efficient searches, intelligent recommendations based on prior browsing history, fast and free shipping and making consumers increasingly reliant on online reviews “fundamentally changed our wiring as consumers” to such an extent that “many experiences we have with other retailers seem somehow dissonant now.”
“Free shipping is certainly one aspect of how Amazon has recalibrated our consumer brains, to be honest.”–Doug Stephens
Fast, Cheap and Out of Control
Studies and surveys show that customers increasingly want their stuff, they want it now, and they don’t want to pay extra. The number of customers who said they would pay nothing extra for next-day delivery increased to 38% from 22% between 2015 and 2016, according to a September Deloitte online survey published in the Wall Street Journal. The number willing to pay more for same-day delivery showed a similar increase in resistance, with 32% in 2016 saying they would not pay extra, up from 24% in 2015.
One study found free shipping to be the top incentive to online buying, “with almost nine in 10 consumers reporting that free shipping would make them shop more online,” according to a survey by Walker Sands Communications of 1,400 U.S. consumers. “This number has steadily increased over the past two years and has become significantly more influential than other logistics considerations, even as same-day shipping becomes more prominent,” says the firm in its “Future of Retail 2016” white paper.
Exactly how much is free shipping eating into profits? Jerry Storch, CEO of Hudson’s Bay Company, which includes Lord & Taylor and Saks Fifth Avenue, has pointed to the high costs as well as the larger, fundamental problem of e-commerce: “The economics are clear,” he said at the Shoptalk conference in 2016. “Direct-to-home has a supply chain cost three times higher than a store-based model. So, when we say the internet retailer can charge less, how can that be? Maybe this is why so many of us have so much trouble emulating Amazon’s model and making any money. It’s because it’s really expensive and it is also why Amazon [has] had trouble making money on merchandising sales. It’s a very expensive model and it’s not less expensive than the store-based model.”
The expectation for free shipping, and the heightened awareness around price generally, is something retailers brought on themselves, says Fader. “The reason we are having this conversation is because it’s a race to the bottom. Anything that retailers do that calls attention to price is not in their best interest. That plays to Amazon’s strength, and most retailers can’t win that battle.”
Amazon and other mega-retailers can negotiate lower shipping rates than smaller retailers, and Amazon Prime U.S. membership has doubled in the past two years, to an estimated 80 million members. Prime carries an increasing number of benefits, and Prime members spend more than non-Prime customers: an estimated $1,300 versus $700 per year, according to Consumer Intelligence Research Partners.
“Free shipping is not going away since Amazon knows that it is painful to them but much more debilitating for their competitors,” says Wharton emeritus marketing professor Stephen J. Hoch. “Amazon Prime is a two-part tariffs pricing policy, where Amazon sells stuff for close to cost and makes all their profit on the fixed membership fee, just like Costco. And free shipping is just another cost that Amazon absorbs in order to get the flat fee and longer term loyalty.”
“Free shipping is not going away since Amazon knows that it is painful to them but much more debilitating for their competitors.”–Stephen J. Hoch
Very specialized sellers don’t compete with Amazon and so should have little trouble passing on shipping costs to their buyers, Hoch adds. “I might also point out that, due to huge investments in logistics and IT along with massive scale, Amazon’s shipping costs are likely significantly lower than most competitors – even Walmart.”
While Amazon invests in the delivery fleet of the future, Walmart has fired a low-tech salvo in the struggle between the two retailers. It recently started a pilot program in which store employees drop off online orders to customers on their way home from work. “There is really strong overlap between where our associates are already heading after work and where those packages need to go,” a Walmart spokesman told The Washington Post.
How Fun Can Be Better Than Free
One way in which retailers might be able to side-step the free-delivery trap is to give customers another system of options and incentives — “to try to get the customer once again to bear the cost of that last mile,” says Kahn, “so even if you are shopping online, if you pick it up in person in the store, that saves a lot of money.”
Another option, she suggests, is giving customers a better price on an item if they are willing to wait until a delivery truck is already scheduled to come to a particular neighborhood.
Ultimately, says Kahn, “the competition is going to be at the platform level. For example, if you tell Alexa you’re out of milk, then you’re going to be getting it from Amazon — when consumers shop for things that need to be replenished, it will be a big advantage when a voice recognition system is in the house, particularly if it gets to the point where everything is automatically delivered. Once people are locked into a system, it’s a loyalty loop; if Amazon — or Google or Facebook — can make shopping super-convenient, and deliver items easily when you need them at a competitive price, people will stop going to the physical stores for these kinds of items.”
But another big way retailers can alleviate the burden of free shipping, and take on Amazon, is by doing what the best of them have done well for so long: making shopping a joyful experience. Amazon is all about efficiency. Even its bricks-and-mortar stores telegraph this ethos. Like the website, the new Amazon bookstore model is cheaper for Prime customers — again, highlighting price — and stocks only 3,000 of the most popular titles. The store serves as both a big advertisement for Prime and a tidy way for Amazon to eliminate some of its own cost of free shipping. It has not been getting good reviews.
“Amazon’s first bookstore in New York City sucks the joy out of buying books,” was the headline on one recent review of the experience at the relatively small (4,000-square-foot) store on Columbus Circle. “For the most part, the layout creates clutter that mirrors Amazon’s own site, except without the ease of actually getting the book you want quickly and cheaply,” writes Thu-Huong Ha in Quartz.
“They’ve taken the fun and joy and treasure-hunt aspect out of retailing, and made it into this cold, calculating science, and you just don’t want to play that game.”–Peter Fader
“They’ve taken the fun and joy and treasure-hunt aspect out of retailing, and made it into this cold, calculating science, and you just don’t want to play that game,” says Fader about Amazon generally, pointing to the AEIOUs of retailing as a means of focusing on what matters to shoppers. A is for advice, which great sales people are skilled at offering; E is for experiential value, such as providing snacks or samples as customers browse a pleasant, attractive store environment; I is for interaction, as in with humans, who might be specially trained to provide different service levels for the best customers; O is for opportunities that are often missed online that misinterpret past buying histories to make inappropriate recommendations or that miss cross-selling opportunities; and U is for understanding, which traditional retailers often don’t gather efficiently from their own salespeople about what customers are looking for and how the experience might be improved.
“There’s no P for price in there,” says Fader. “It’s a matter of creating a competing proposition that people just want to buzz about. Part of that is experiential, making it a joy to interact with that company, and part of it is going to be personalization — the kinds of things Amazon does not want to do that could raise costs.”
In other words, says Fader, it’s about retailers sending the message to the customer: “We anticipate your needs, it’s not just about efficiency and price.”
The extent to which retailers are being threatened by free shipping depends on which end of the spectrum a retailer positions a brand, says Stephens. “Right now, there are two kinds of shopping — fast shopping and slow shopping. Fast is commodity items, as in it’s 10 at night and I’m in my pajamas and I want to find what I need from Amazon. And I think there is a place for fast shopping. It’s about breadth of assortment, ease of finding it, and how cheaply you can get it.”
If you go up against Amazon, then fast and free shipping is an essential arrow in the quiver, Stephens says, and Walmart is being drawn into that fight. “But if you’re a brand about slow shopping, it’s about having a rich, immersive, tactile and maybe even emotionally connected experience, and then the emphasis is taken off [of free shipping],” Stephens notes. “Some customers might abandon their cart when it comes to paying for shipping, but many will say it’s worth the difference.”
Which companies have been good at differentiating themselves? Stephens believes Sephora succeeds. “You could argue that cosmetics are commodity items,” he says. “They don’t necessarily sell things that can’t be purchased elsewhere, but they’ve managed to create an experience online and in stores that is elevated compared to the Amazon experience.” He notes that Sephora has strong content, good technology in stores and “they hire true brand ambassadors – not just salespeople who are half there. They get customers to bypass Amazon and go to the store itself.”
“Amazon is not the end of competition, or the end of fun. People still have a need for that. And that’s what it should be.”–Barbara Kahn
Kahn agrees that experience is critical. “Amazon is positioned to take over these kinds of basic-need items. They offer large assortment, convenience and fair prices,” she says. “But I think people will still find value and fun in shopping, or they will respond to a cool new brand. The value added could be experiential or aesthetic, something different that will attract people, and consumers will go to that.”
With Amazon, we really are in a paradigm shift in terms of change in shopping behavior, Kahn adds. “Long ago, Walmart broke the mold and radically changed the grocery business, and the big box stores broke the mold. But Amazon is not the end of competition, or the end of fun. People still have a need for that. And that’s what it should be. Shopping is not always about just pushing a button and then something arrives on your doorstep. People will still enjoy ‘retail therapy.’”
Kahn also doubts that free shipping is going away, but says the economics of it will be hard to sustain without some mitigating factor. “I do think there will be some kind of shake out,” she says, “and then it’s maybe you get free shipping, but you are paying a subscription price, or the price is built in somewhere else. It’s like the way you are lured into a store to get some incredible discount on something for sale, and then there is a higher premium on the other things you bought along with the sale item. You get free shipping, but the margins come from somewhere else.”

Who Will Survive the Retail Reckoning of 2017?

Store Closings
Legacy retailers’ ongoing struggle to stay relevant in a landscape increasingly dominated by Amazon and online upstarts has come to a head in the past year. Companies will close thousands of stores this year – and some may not survive at all.

While it may seem that retail is headed for an apocalypse dominated by dead malls, in reality it’s a needed industry shakeout.
“The U.S. is overstored and we’re in the middle of a painful reset,” said Carrie Ask, executive vice president and president of global retail for Levi Strauss. “What’s dominating the headlines is that retail is not successful; it’s not transforming fast enough. But when you pull back the top layer, that perception is people’s reaction to all of these headlines talking about store closures.”
At the recent Retail East Summit in New York, Ask, Avon director of digital strategy and e-commerce Sapna Shah Parikh and Shyam Gidumal, leader of EY’s consumer products and retail market segment, discussed where retail is headed next and what the landscape might look like in the next decade. The conference was organized by Knowledge@Wharton and Momentum Event Group.
Retailers including The Limited, Bebe, Wet Seal and hhgregg shut down for good this year. Michael Kors, Payless ShoeSource, Sears, J.C. Penney, Macy’s, Abercrombie and Fitch and others will close dozens – in some cases, hundreds — of stores in 2017. Over Memorial Day weekend, Radio Shack closed more than 1,000 stores across the country. The company once had over 7,000 stores; now, just 70 corporate-owned stores and 500 dealer stores are left.
“We need to raise our game as an industry because we don’t own that consumer; they’re not captive to us anymore.”–Carrie Ask

Levi Strauss’s Ask noted that the U.S. has as much as five times more retail square footage per person than that of other developed countries, leaving it with an unviable store footprint. While many of the current doom-and-gloom headlines are more about industry retrenchment than an outright death for traditional retail, she said that brands will not survive if they don’t find ways to transform the customer experience.
“Even 10 years ago, consumers had to do a lot of settling. They went to a store and wanted a thing and, when it wasn’t there they had to either pick something different, go to a different store or come back later,” Ask said. “Consumers no longer have to settle. They have more options than ever, and it’s all right there on their phone. We need to raise our game as an industry because we don’t own that consumer; they’re not captive to us anymore.”
The End of ‘Settling’
Although most retailers know they need to transform, few are confident in the exact path forward. Parikh said that there are a couple of key truths that retailers need to face as they find a way to change course. Number one: The industry “missed the boat” in understanding the impact of Amazon.
“With that miss, there was the ability for companies like Amazon and others to really create a customer expectation and also meet those demands,” she said. “Now that we missed it, we need to figure out how to correct it.”
Infrastructure is a big part of that, Parikh noted, but it’s more than just changing a company’s footprint. “For a company like Avon, you have legacy systems and the massive footprint of millions of representatives across the globe. How do you change and innovate with that footprint? We have to look at the incentive structure for employees – have they been incentivized to take risks?”
Gidumal added that retailers’ legacy organizational structures and systems are often built around the idea that the digital arm of the business is separate from the rest, with a different management team, inventory and pricing methods. But modern consumers “don’t want to go to the store and have one experience and then go online and have a totally disconnected experience.”
But creating a totally connected experience is easier said than done. For Levi’s, one of the challenges is tying together the customer’s experience on the company’s website or in one of its company-owned stores with what happens when someone visits a franchise store or buys a pair of 501 jeans at a department store. Ask said there are six things that really matter when a brand is trying to create an integrated marketplace:
  • A single destination that houses all product information so every point of distribution has the same information.
  • One view of inventory – “so you can make commitments to consumers that if they make the effort to pick up a product, it will be there for them.”
  • Detailed transaction information.
  • A single consumer profile that houses their transaction history: “It drives me batty when I get a pop-up ad on a website for something I just bought.”
  • An integrated cross-channel strategy for contacting customers.
  • Walkthroughs: Ask pointed out that marketers used to do store walkthroughs prior to seasonal launches. She said the practice should be revived to make sure that campaigns are cohesive across all channels.
Gidumal said cost is often one of the biggest obstacles to bringing all the pieces together. “The cost that comes with retooling is so meaningful and the benefit is aspirational,” he noted.
The Cost of Retooling
Ask, who noted that that she works directly alongside Levi’s president of e-commerce and chief information officer, said the company keeps three key inputs in mind when considering investments in new systems and technology. The first is current financials by channel and by market, which she noted vary considerably.  “What is the channel-specific economy and what are the drivers of that?”
“We have to look at the incentive structure for employees — have they been incentivized to take risks?”–Sapna Shah Parikh
The second is analyzing what capabilities need to be built and what the benefits are likely to be by channel. Finally, Ask said they discuss what it would take to build the tool or system so it will be dynamic and can be turned on and off so the company can analyze the costs and benefits through every layer of the marketplace. “It gets to be a really fascinating way of thinking about an idea; it shatters the idea of a digital arm of the organization because it forces all of us to think digital,” she noted.
Parikh said Avon has tried to break down siloes by keeping the focus on Avon representatives and how different systems can make it easier for them to sell to their customers. “Understanding the end consumer has helped us to raise the bar for representatives in their entrepreneurial activities,” she said. “Because of advancements in AI and social media data, we’re able to connect them better with potential customers and empower them with data they need to help sell.
“At the end of the day, it should come down to that single customer,” she added. “What does a company like Amazon do better than we do? They know the customer; they know the customer inside and out. They have the ability because they have one channel.”
Ask expected the challenges that retailers are facing will also spill over to developers. “I think we’re going to descend into the world of haves and have nots in real estate, and the tipping point is traffic,” she said. “Retailers should be asking landlords what plan they have to preserve, protect and develop traffic at their locations. Retailers can’t afford to pay yesterday’s rent for a store that is down in traffic by double-digits. They’re going to have to walk away from those locations.”
But she noted that while U.S. retail is overburdened as a whole, plenty of individual brands are not, and many individual shopping centers are still growing their traffic. The differentiator, Ask added, is often which brands or developments are creating unique experiences for customers.
Retail of the Future
That trend toward the experiential is also what Ask named as one of the drivers of successful retail in the future. “From now on, there is no day off, no downtime; consumers are on all the time, and so should we be,” she said. “We’re not just competing with other retailers and other brands. We’re competing for what consumers want to spend money on.” She noted that the U.S. apparel industry last year grew 3%, while the U.S. domestic travel industry grew 5%, and there are seven million more cruise passengers today than there were 10 years ago.
“People are spending more on experiences. We know they want to look good when they’re taking all those selfies — so how can we be there?”–Carrie Ask
“Last year, for the first time, American consumers spent more at bars and restaurants than on groceries,” she noted. “People are spending more on experiences. We know they want to look good when they’re taking all those selfies – so how can we be there?”
Parikh also expected winners to emerge from retailers that can find innovative ways to deliver goods. She noted that free shipping is “ubiquitous,” but is also one of the largest P&L expenses from an e-commerce standpoint. “It’s just not sustainable having UPS and FedEx be our core delivery system,” Parikh said. “Amazon has done great stuff around drones and developing pick-up spots. I see that trend increasing.”
In closing, Parikh and Ask were asked to describe the consumer experience in 2027. Parikh imagined that she would be “sitting on my sofa, and my refrigerator will be automatically replenished with products I need without me having to do anything.”
Ask imagined a consumer visiting the Coachella music festival and “checking out a trucker jacket or denim shorts and being able to take a photo of them and find out what it is, where it is available near them and choosing to ship it to their house or to get it in a store.” She noted that the latter is more cost-effective from the retailer’s standpoint. “So how do we make it so compelling that they want to go to the store because of the benefits?” she asked.
Image by Phillip Pessar from Miami, USA – Radio Shack Sprint Store Closing, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50681716

2016/06/20

Retailers Subdued In Support Of Gay Pride

Last year, retailers joined in the celebration of extension of marriage rights to same-sex couples that permeated Pride month. From parade floats to social media campaigns, merchants participated in Pride and capitalized on the festive occasion.
(Photo credit: SANDY HUFFAKER/AFP/Getty Images)
Whereas last year retailers were flying the rainbow flag as a banner, creating hashtags and declaring “Love is Love,”  you have to look a lot harder this year to find evidence of that support. Instead of being loud and proud, it’s a quiet kind of support.
Participants in Pride celebrations will see floats and promotional sponsorship from brands, and readers of specialized media will know which companies are supporting LGBTQ issues. But the larger population would be hard pressed to notice.

Perhaps there’s less of a celebratory mood this year, following the massacre of 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando. The horrific act has certainly cast a pall over festivities.
Target lost two employees that night, Mercedez Flores and Luis Omar Ocasio-Capo. The company made a $250,000 donation to the OneOrlando Fund, established by Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer to help victims and their families in the community.
This more somber approach is evident across retail.

Target does have a Pride shop online and in stores, where shoppers can purchase tank tops and beach towels festooned with rainbows.

Macy’s is out and proud in its support of gay rights this month and throughout the year. It recently partnered with Elton John and Lady Gaga for the Love Bravery collection. The Proposition Love jewelry at Macy’s donates 10% of all proceeds to support marriage equality and gay rights and the retailer supports the Trevor Project, an organization to support young people in the LGBTQ community.

Gap’s Old Navy division has a handful of Pride merchandise for sale online.
But other large retailers are strongly quiet in their support. Walmart celebrated Pride last year and its Asda division in the U.K. has been very vocal in support of LGBTQ rights. But here at home, the company is silent on this and other hot button topics.

Maybe this quiet support of Pride is fallout from the Orlando killings — merchants worry about walking the line between support and crass marketing — or maybe many are weary from the fallout over the rights of transgender individuals to use public restrooms.
Retailers support gay rights and events for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, it’s a recognition of thediversity within a company’s customer base and among employees. It’s also good businesses, as cause-related marketing results in sales.

But for some, it’s simply the right thing to do. Because love is love.
Follow me on Twitter @lfheller, get my newsletter atFierceRetail