Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta JPMorgan Chase. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta JPMorgan Chase. Mostrar todas las entradas

2015/02/26

Is JPMorgan Chase really America's dog-friendliest bank?

  • by 
  •  

  • It turns out that the bank is pretty dog friendly. But it has plenty of competition on this front.

    JPMorgan Chase’s CEO Jamie Dimon wants investors and regulators to know that his bank is not about risky whale-sized derivatives trading. What is JPMorgan Chase really about? Serving regular Americans, who love dogs.
    On Tuesday, at JPMorgan’s annual investor day, Dimon stressed how dog-friendly the bank’s branches are. “Around the country, people bring in their dogs and sit around for social reasons,” said Dimon. “We give out little doggie bones.”
    The bank’s event was packed with six hours of presentations from top executives and included plenty of PowerPoint. There were 78 slides on the company’s consumer banking operation alone. But Dimon’s dog biscuit statement got more responses on social media than just about anything else that was said during the day:
    1. @matt_levine @ReformedBroker He likes it! He says some branches give out doggie treats.
    @carney @matt_levine @ReformedBroker this is american banking at it’s best! free coffee, pens, and dog treats for everyone
    Turns out JPMorgan  JPM 0.65%  is indeed pretty dog friendly. In fact, a lot of banks are competing to be America’s friendliest bank to man’s best friend.
    Dimon’s “doggie bone” statement, though, is only mostly accurate. Not every branch is giving out treats. There are two Chase bank branches within a quarter mile of my midtown Manhattan office. Both say customers are welcome to bring in their dogs to make deposits, get money orders, or socialize. But neither one has doggie treats. That could be because there aren’t a lot of people looking to socialize with their dogs in midtown Manhattan. The people I talked to at all three branches seemed to know that dog treats were available at other branches. An employee at the Chase branch at 96th and Broadway, on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, told me about the dog treats when I asked if I could bring in my dog. (Full disclosure: I don’t actually own a dog.)
    A reporter at Fortune who does have a dog and is a Chase customer says she regularly gets dog treats when she goes in to a branch, but she has to ask for them. (Her dog now wants to go banking all the time.)
    Rover.com lists Austin first on its list of America’s most dog-friendly cities. An employee at a Chase bank branch in an office building in downtown Austin says it has dog treats, but that I would need to use the entrance in the back of the building. The guard at the front entrance, which is also used by other tenants, does not allow dogs in the building. One Austin dog owner, though, seems happy with her Chase experience.
    I’m not sure if being dog friendly and handing out treats gets banks customers, but a lot of banks seem to think that it will. The trend appears to have been started by Commerce Bank, which, according to Wikipedia at least, gave out lollipops as well, though not for dogs. TD Bank  TD 1.29% , which bought Commerce in 2007, mentions that it has dog biscuits available on the about page on its website. I did not find any similar language on JPMorgan’s website. The Wells Fargo  WFC -0.36%  branches I called told me they offer customers dog treats.
    The one exception among all these dog-loving big banks is Citigroup  C 0.19% . An employee at the Citibank branch six blocks south of my office told me that, other than for blind customers, dogs are not allowed in its branch. I got the same message from other Citi branches. One asked me how big my dog was, which was hard to answer because I don’t have a dog. A staffer at a Citi branch in San Francisco, which is also listed on Rover.com as a dog-friendly city, told me that dogs are allowed in the bank as long as they are leashed. No treats.
    Jamie Dimon has been talking about dogs quite a bit lately. On the bank’s most recent earnings call, Dimon said JPMorgan would do just fine as long as the firm “stops stepping in dog shit, which we do every now and then.” I believe he was speaking metaphorically. Then again, maybe this has something to do with all the dog socializing going on at JPMorgan’s branches?
    JPMorgan has another kind of canine connection. The Oscar-winning film Dog Day Afternoon is based on a 1972 bank robbery of a Chase branch in Brooklyn. The movie has nothing to do with actual dogs.

    2014/08/28

    JPMorgan Chase, other U.S. banks hit by cyberattacks

  • by  



  • Hackers targeted major banks and siphoned off reams of data, reports say.

    U.S. banks have become the latest target for cyberattacks.
    Reports say hackers gained access to the networks of at least five banks, including JPMorgan Chase  JPM -0.84% , and funneled off gigabytes of data.
    The sophisticated cyberattack, as experts call it, included access to checking and savings account information, reported the New York Times. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been investigating and security firms specializing in digital forensic studies have been tapped to study the intruded networks in recent weeks.
    The reasons behind the attacks are unclear. Authorities have not confirmed the origin of the hackers or whether the events were motivated by financial or espionage reasons. Bloomberg News first reported the breaches and indicated that it was the work of Russian hackers, though that has not been confirmed officially.
    Russian hackers have previously assaulted foreign computer networks as retaliation, including a crippling attack on Estonia’s networks in 2007 after workers moved a Soviet-era war monument from the country’s capital.
    Other politically-motivated hacking scandals included Iran’s denial of service, or DDoS, attacks on U.S. banks following Western economic sanctions and an anti-Islam video mocking the Prophet Muhammad. The DDoS attacks caused banking websites to drastically slow or intermittently collapse.
    The nature of the most recent banking intrusions doesn’t appear to be politically driven. Banking site services weren’t disrupted during the attacks, which appear to be intended to gather financial or intelligence information, people with knowledge of the investigation told the Times.
    JPMorgan has not seen heightened levels of fraud as of yet, possibly a sign that the hackers may not have been after only financial information. Until security firms present conclusive evidence, officials cannot confirm the reason or source of the attacks.
  • 2013/05/20

    El banquero favorito de Wall Street afronta una revuelta de los accionistas

    El banquero favorito de Wall Street afronta una revuelta de los accionistasTras llevar al banco a ganancias récord, algunos creen que su salida reduciría en 10% el valor de la firma en la bolsa.

    Por Renato García Jiménez


    
James “Jamie” Dimon, el presidente y director ejecutivo de JPMorgan Chase, es uno de los banqueros más emblemáticos de Estados Unidos. En medio de la crisis financiera logró mantener la rentabilidad del negocio y fue de los pocos que defendió el honor de la industria ante las acusaciones en el Congreso contra la avaricia corporativa. 

    En 2011, durante un discurso de Ben Bernanke sobre la nueva regulación de la banca, sólo su voz se alzó desde el auditorio que escuchaba en silencio las reprimendas del presidente de la Fed, y denunció enérgicamente el costo que estas restricciones tendrían para la economía.

    Hoy, sin embargo, su liderazgo está cuestionado. JPMorgan enfrenta investigaciones por manipulación del mercado energético, lavado de dinero, abusivas políticas de embargo hipotecario, hacer negocios con Bernard Madoff, y ocultar información en el caso de la “ballena de Londres”, el operador británico que perdió US$ 6.200 millones en apuestas con derivados en el mayor revés en la historia de la firma.

    Una costosa rebelión


    Pero Dimon afronta una amenaza más inminente. Una revuelta de los accionistas podría despojarlo en la junta de mañana de su cargo de presidente. Según cercanos a Dimon, ya habría advertido en privado que si pierde la votación dejará la institución, lo que podría tener serias consecuencias para JPMorgan. Mike Mayo, uno de los principales analistas del sector financiero de Nueva York, calcula que su salida podría hacer caer las acciones del banco en 10% y destruir de golpe US$ 20 mil millones en valor de mercado. En una reciente entrevista con Bloomberg, Ken Langone, el multimillonario fundador de Home Depot que tiene varios millones invertidos en la compañía, reconoció estar “aterrorizado” de que su salida provoque un derrumbe de las acciones.

    Los temores de Langone están justificados. A pesar de sus numerosos conflictos con las autoridades, Dimon ha sido clave para el desempeño del banco en los últimos años. En 2011 JPMorgan desplazó a Bank of America como el mayor banco de Estados Unidos por activos. Y el año pasado registró ganancias récord por US$ 21.300 millones. 

    “Que me condenen”


    Para sus aliados, el éxito comercial es suficiente como para compensar los últimos traspiés que ha sufrido su administración. Pero también sería una de las razones por las cuales Dimon ha aparecido con una actitud tan arrogante frente a sus críticos, negándose a hacer un mea culpa por los últimos escándalos. “Tuvimos ganancias récord el año pasado”, proclamó ante un auditorio lleno de analistas en febrero de 2012. “Tuvimos ganancias récord el año anterior, y que me condenen si no tenemos ganancias récord durante algunos años más”, exclamó desafiante.

    Como el ejecutivo más poderoso en el mayor banco de Estados Unidos, Dimon no sólo dirige una planilla de 256 mil trabajadores, sino que además está a cargo de activos por US$ 2,4 billones (millones de millones), más que los ministros de Finanzas de la mayoría de los países del mundo.

    Pero algunos sostienen que el sistema financiero ha cambiado desde la crisis de 2008 y que hoy los buenos resultados en los balances ya no son suficientes como para justificar cualquier cosa.

    Los accionistas votarán por separar los cargos de presidente y director ejecutivo, pero la moción no tiene tanto que ver con un ajuste administrativo, sino con un cuestionamiento al desproporcionado peso que ha adquirido la figura del banquero.

    La junta de Goldman Sachs
    JPMorgan no es el único banco de Wall Street que tendrá una reunión agitada con sus accionistas este año. Goldman Sachs, otro de los grandes bancos de Nueva York, realizará su junta el jueves, donde se votará la reelección del directorio y el millonario plan de compensaciones para los ejecutivos.
    En representación de un grupo de accionistas, la consultora Glass Lewis & Co. ha criticado las "deficientes" prácticas de remuneraciones de la compañía y adelantó que votará en contra de la reelección de James Johnson, el director en servicios más antiguo de Goldman y presidente del comité de remuneraciones del banco desde que se abrió a bolsa en 1999.
    Por su parte, en una carta abierta a los accionistas, la firma de inversiones de Nueva York, Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, que gestiona US$ 15 mil millones en Nueva York, cuestionó el papel de Johnson en una "escandalosa debacle de gobierno corporativo".  Uno de sus socios, William Ruane, está vinculado al influyente gurú de las finanzas Warren Buffett.


    www.df.cl